Talk:Paul Whybrew

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No Mention of the Michael Fagan incident?[edit]

Why is the incident involving Michael Fagan not mentioned?--DiamondElusive (talk) 21:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link dead[edit]

First reference link is dead.64.134.234.202 (talk) 23:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance?[edit]

Exactly how is he of relevance to justify an article about him? If he played a serious role in the Fagan incident then it isn't explained here.217.190.142.201 (talk) 18:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Paul Whybrew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

Isn't that Tall Paul in the background, standing with the mace? Peter Ormond 💬 17:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]