Talk:Patrick Caddell

---

Reader opinion

i'm watching this guy on c-span right now and if he thinks he speaks to young alienated voters, he's crazy - his "strategy" for the republicans is to compare same-sex marriage with polygamy - perhaps a more suitable or more current quote about him would be appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.195.184.215 (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Tone

I'm amazed at the tone of this article. It could use attention to the refs which some appear to be pure opinion pieces and biased. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 21:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Patrick Caddell/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

The article "Pat Caddell" purports to be a biography, but doesn't begin to give a representation of his work. This is typical: Despite the fact that no Democratic campaign has officially recruited Pat Caddell in years, he continues to claim to be a Democratic pollster, with Fox News touting him regularly. His appearances generally involve him attacking Democratic politicians and predicting the downfall of the Democratic party. Apart from being incomplete and argumentative, its assertions are completely unsourced. Whether his appearances "generally involve him attacking Democratic politicians" is not a question of fact, but opinion, and in this case a hopelessly biased opinion. It could accurately be stated that Caddell warned the Democrats in late 2004 not to go after George Bush's National Guard service and famously predicted that if the CBS 60 Minutes' story turned out to be based upon a forged document, that the election "would be over," and George Bush would win. Caddell's explanation of that prediction was that the Democratic Party leadership had become involved in promoting the story. While it is not difficult to see some criticism of Democratic Party leaders in there, Caddell's position can also be seen as an attempt to help his party by warning them away from a self-defeating tactic.

Last edited at 21:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 02:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Edits of this date

Came to article, and found 2012 refimprove tag to no longer be helpful. Principle needs of article now are

• (i) standardization of source formats, to eliminate URL-only formats, at same time checking them to be live;
• (ii) verification of content to sources, as it appears content was placed first, then citations added post hoc (and in a sloppy fashion); and
• (iii) making the lead representative of the article.

Because of needs (ii) and (iiii), I added the expert attention needed tag. Otherwise, today, I provided the apparent source of the long block quote, and added the Carter presidency as the main career period for which he is known, to the lede, Good luck to Carter era history editors. Cheers. Le Prof. 73.211.138.148 (talk) 07:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Patrick Caddell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101228140431/http://www.salon.com:80/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/22/hack_list_27/index.html to http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/22/hack_list_27/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060618165816/http://homepage.mac.com:80/mkoldys/iblog/C168863457/E843999729/index.html to http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/iblog/C168863457/E843999729/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Sources

Every line is sourced, I don't understand the issue label regarding the sources. Can someone explain? Maybe it is just dated and needs to be removed.--FrankTursetta (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)