Talk:Order of Saint Hubert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOrder of Saint Hubert has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 21, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 18, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Current status: Good article

Comments[edit]

Is this order still active? If not when did it fall into disuse? Lead is a bit short.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lead expanded. I'm not a fan of the named refs; they make it difficult for newbies (and experienced editors also) to edit a piece, or add to it. So I'll not do that, but thanks for the advice. Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Royalty, nobility and heraldry subtopic[edit]

The article belongs in this subtopic because the award was not necessarily based on military performance. Its award elevated an individual and his wife to Knighthood. Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:42, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another one photo of Order from Russian collections. Maybe it will be useful. --Shakko (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another Order of St Hubert?[edit]

Unless there's another Order of St Hubert this article should be moved to Order of St Hubert.--Wetman (talk) 08:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsible list of notable recipients[edit]

Given the large number of notable recipients of this award, having a full list would likely make the article unwieldy. I'd like to add a collapsible list though. Any objections? - RevelationDirect (talk) 09:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable recipients