Talk:Opposition to World War I

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Opposition to World War I article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Anti-war Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War I task force

old comment[edit]

Does any one know CO stats for countries other than Britain? Like the US?Celsiana 01:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ZiyaoGuo (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)For each country, there is no reliable source to support the idea.For citation number 6, which is a personal blog and I do not think it is a good resource. For citation number 7, the link does not work really well.From doing the Wiki training, I learned that reliable sources are really important. For a good Wiki page, there should be more information come from a unbiased and official published site or book.[reply]

Removal of conent[edit]

Someone has removed the content for the subheadings for Great Britain and the United States - can someone poss replace (someone who knows how to edit Wiki properly- I'm sure I'd just mash it up!) - robin, UK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.49.97.4 (talk) 08:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:After the war a medal and maybe a job2.jpg to appear as POTD soon[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:After the war a medal and maybe a job2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 12, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-07-12. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 18:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

"After the war, a medal and maybe a job", an anti-World War I editorial cartoon showing a soldier who is missing the lower half of his body dragging himself along with his hands, with his intestines trailing behind him. A fat capitalist sitting in a chair offers him a medal for his service.Artist: John French Sloan; Restoration: Lise Broer

Archive – More featured pictures...

Why is opposition in non-English-speaking countries mostly not included in this article?[edit]

2001:5B0:223A:ABE8:50F4:2E26:281D:728D (talk) 02:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women's "church groups" opposed to the war[edit]

I agree with the 'clarification needed' tag against the vague statement that "women in church groups were especially anti-war". By groups does the writer think denominations, denominational organisations or Christian non-sectarian organisations (inasmuch any of the latter existed then)? The Anglican and international Mother's Union, for example, had no organisational policy against the war with many of its members being the wives and mothers of British Empire servicemen, and of Anglican clergy serving as forces chaplains.Cloptonson (talk) 08:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]