Talk:Olga von Türk-Rohn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Olga von Türk-Rohn
Olga von Türk-Rohn
  • ... that soprano Olga von Türk-Rohn (pictured) was celebrated for her interpretations of Franz Schubert's lieder? Source: Kutsch, K. J.; Riemens, Leo (2003). "Türk-Rohn, Olga von". In Rost, Hansjörg (ed.). Grosses Sängerlexikon. Vol. Suvanny–Zysset. K. G. Saur Verlag. p. 4783.
Created by 4meter4 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 70 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

4meter4 (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Verified that the article is long enough, that there are no plagiarism concerns through the Copyvios tool and spotchecking, and that the hook is sourced in the article. Cunard (talk) 08:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Great work on this article on a very accomplished soprano! 4meter4 (talk · contribs), I copyedited the article. I noticed that the article uses two date formats. For example, the "Early life and opera" section has "3 June 1865". The "Marriage and career as a concert soprano in Europe" section has "October 6, 1891" and "18 April 1895". The "Later life and career in the United States" section has "November 13, 1913", "November 13, 1924", "November 27, 1925", and "26 February 1940". All the dates in the "References" section follow the "February 27, 1940" format. I recommend using the same date format through the article per MOS:DATEUNIFY. The inconsistent date formatting is a minor issue that does not affect the DYK criteria, so I am approving the DYK. Cunard (talk) 08:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]