Talk:O Clássico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

scores of the matches[edit]

I think this article is missing the score of the matches between the two teams. That is what comes to mind when we speak about the clash, not a single result is mentioned in the entire article.

It could have a list of all the results, and statistics such as:

Total Championship victories (Benfica X - Y Porto) Total Cup victories (Benfica X - Y Porto) Total Victories (Benfica X - Y Porto) Total Goals (Benfica X - Y Porto) Biggest win (Benfica X - Y Porto) / (Porto X - Y Benfica)

something of the sorts..

As it is it should probably be renamed as "Benfica - Porto rivalry / dominion" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.111.52.133 (talk) 05:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broken sources[edit]

Zerozero website changes broke the sources in "Head-to-head results". Same thing happened in Derby de Lisboa. SLBedit (talk) 14:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted User:SLBedit edition, because those 2 fields/parameters are related to Clássico games only (most fcp-slb/slb-fcp games and goals), as in template documentation (and its logical. The article is about one particular event, most appearances and goals in that event). About most goals in clássico, there are one source that indicates 17 goals for RuiJosé Águas, but if we sum the goals, there are 20. About most appearances, couldn't fine any information.Rpo.castro (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the source for José Águas? SLBedit (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Source. Zerozero source link corrected, and verified matches with José Águas, and 2 (or 3) were wrong. Now has the same goals as the source, and was added to infobox.Rpo.castro (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes[edit]

39.116.244.195 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has been adding: unsourced information to the earliest league matches; a match that have never happened (between reserve teams); and matches that have not been played yet. SLBedit (talk) 16:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Cup[edit]

"According to Jules Rimet, 3rd President of FIFA, the Latin Cup was a competition created by FIFA at request of the four nations that contested it, but its regulation was made by a committee composed of members from the competing federations, and FIFA did not participate actively in its organisation."[1] Only a fanatic deceived by convict J. Marques considers it not major. SLBedit (talk) 21:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA acknowledged the trophy. UEFA acknowledges its importance. SLBedit (talk) 23:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SAPO Desporto[2]

Record[3]

References

  1. ^ Rimet, Pierre (4 January 1951). Rodrigues Filho, Mário (ed.). "Cartas de Paris – Das pirâmides do Egito ao colosso do Maracanã, com o Sr. Jules Rimet" [Letters from Paris – From the pyramids of Egypt to the colossus of Maracanã, with Mr. Jules Rimet]. Jornal dos Sports (in Portuguese). No. 6554. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. p. 5. Retrieved 2 June 2017. A Taça Latina é uma competição criada pela F. I. F. A. a pedido dos quatro países que a disputam atualmente. Mas o Regulamento é feito por uma Comissão composta por membros das Federações concorrentes e de fato a F. I. F. A. não participa ativamente na organização
  2. ^ "Benfica soma 80.º troféu da sua história, mais a Taça Latina" [Benfica add up 80th trophy in their history, plus the Latin Cup]. SAPO Desporto (in Portuguese). 28 May 2017. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017. Retrieved 31 May 2017.
  3. ^ Viegas, João Socorro (20 May 2016). "Benfica reforça estatuto de clube mais titulado em Portugal" [Benfica reinforce status of most decorated club in Portugal]. Record (in Portuguese). Archived from the original on 9 November 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2016.