Talk:Not Guilty (song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Not Guilty (song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Not Guilty (song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that The Beatles logged 99 takes of "Not Guilty" but then left it off the White Album?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Not Guilty (song).

Wikipedia

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles Low‑importance

This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[The Beatles (album)#2018 50th Anniversary Edition bonus tracks|50th Anniversary box set]] The anchor (#2018 50th Anniversary Edition bonus tracks) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

I question the inclusion of the links to "Song-by-Song" listings in quite a few entries. As this is a commercial service, and very few or none of the songs whose pages have links actually appear on the page you see when you click the link, and you would have to pay to see the song's listing, isn't this just a form of passive spam?

Image copyright problem with Image:GHCover.jpg[edit]

The image Image:GHCover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GH quote[edit]

Ritchie333, bit confused by this edit. Why not go completely with the Billboard interview text? It says everything, whereas the addition of a phrase from Musician 1987 just sort of staggers the message. I think that Billboard quote's dynamite, personally – not only that, but there should be no mistaking the point: it's Lennon and McCartney he's "pissed off" with/at. (Not that we've handled the issue in this article yet, but it's all to do with how George gets back from India, a while after Lennon even, and is appalled at what's going down at Apple.) JG66 (talk) 17:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@JG66: I think that was trying to salvage a gaffe - I put the quote in thinking "aha, an extra quote about the song", then realised it was a subset of the second, so I trimmed the latter down a bit to avoid repetition, and also as it was looking a little bit too long, which tends to invite accusations of too much paraphrasing. I've put Lennon and McCartney in brackets later to emphasise the point, and also mention he went off to Greece not long after recording this, being utterly hacked off with them. Anyway, the DYK is there, I've exhausted the Beatles sources pretty much, so I think we're almost there for a GA if you want to do the nom. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say, can the '87 quote completely and go for:

In an interview with Billboard editor Timothy White in 1999, Harrison explained the message behind the song: "It was me getting pissed off at Lennon and McCartney for the grief I was catching ... I said I wasn't guilty of getting in the way of their career. I said I wasn't guilty of leading them astray in our going to Rishikesh to see the Maharishi. I was sticking up for myself …"

So, cutting down the Huntley quote a touch more (and I'd already cut down what appears in his book).

GA? A long way, in my opinion. Have to say, I'm not sure it's good enough for a B right now … Where's Yeepsi? JG66 (talk) 18:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've got to nip out, so if you want to make the changes, go for it! I think it's good for B - everything is well sourced and the prose is readable. Would be interested to know if anyone's covered the song live. Wonder where it would have gone on the White Album? Side three perhaps, between "Mother Nature's Son" and "Me and my Monkey". Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]