Talk:Niksar
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Niksar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | The contents of the Neocaesarea (episcopal see) page were merged into Niksar. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (22 December 2016) |
Villages[edit]
This section makes article look messy. I suggest removing that section from article.Ugur Olgun 13:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
From Byzantine to Danishmend[edit]
Can someone explain how this came to be? The article jumps from the Byzantines reclaiming Niksar in 1073 to it being Danishmend. So how did it come back to the Turks? Tourskin (talk) 22:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Merge from Cabira?[edit]
If we're sure about the identification with Cabira, shouldn't the pages be merged? — LlywelynII 16:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)