Talk:Nigel Worthington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV dispute[edit]

Added the NPOV dispute because I'm concerned that this article is slowly turning into a soapbox for disgruntled Norwich City fans. Wikipedia articles are not the place to voice frustrations about a manager, there are fans websites for that. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be fact-based and neutral point-of-view. Jameboy 17:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree. I started this article some time back and hoped that others might add insights into Worthington's earlier career (which, as a Norwich fan, I know little about). However, people just seem to chuck throw-away jibes on the end rather than adding anything worthwhile to the body of the article. 69.140.65.251 03:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Also in agreement. About a third of this page seems to be publicity for the Worthy Out campaign. A few suggestions:
"finished a massive 13 points off the play-offs" - remove massive, add finished 9th place?
"time he barbed comments" - I believe his comments were to call the fans left in the stadium true supporters rather than attacking those who left.
"but most online supporters' forums are almost unanimous in their opposition" - remove this altogether, there are numerous debates on the subject at present with both sides.
"capitulation to Preston" - put the 2-0 score, rather than capitulation.
"dire performances during" - POV?
I've made a few changes, made it less POV, and I'll remove the notice for the time being until someone else adds it back in. Any comments? Budgiekiller 20:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. --Dweller 22:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Coolio. So what now for the poor old budgies? Even the Town have overtaken them in the league...!! Budgiekiller 18:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nigel Worthington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]