Talk:Nigel S. Wright

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

PR Firm[edit]

It seems to me like almost all of this page was written by a professional PR firm.

Bilderberg Meeting[edit]

In my opinion given the importance of the Bilderberg Meetings and of those who participate in them it's absurd to suggest that his attendance is not notable.Tillander 22:39, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there evidence that Nigel Wright is a Bilderberg participant? PhoenixTreeDogStagTraveler (talk) 05:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.html http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/bilderberg-the-most-exclusive-secretive-schmooze-fest-in-the-world/article12369073/ Tillander 03:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Graduate honours[edit]

The claim that Wright graduated "magna cum laude" from the University of Toronto is, along with being unsupported by the citations, impossible. Toronto doesn't issue Latin honours and never has. What honours they do grant come in two tiers: distinction and high distinction, comparable to "cum laude" and "summa cum laude" respectively. There is no analogue to "magna cum laude".63x7r5 (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

I've rolled back the latest edit made that removed a sentence about Wright's resignation. While it's true that there is information in the body about it, the lead is meant to cover the most important aspects of the subject, "including any prominent controversies". In Wright's case, the controversy surrounding his resignation probably received more coverage in Canadian media than any other aspect of his career. Therefore, I believe that at least a sentence properly belongs there. mikeman67 (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably include then that the RCMP chose not to pursue a case against Wright -- the way it is phrased, the reader could easily believe the case is ongoing when it is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmathewm (talk • contribs) 20:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]