Talk:New York World Building/GA1

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments[edit]

Infobox and lead both look good.
In #Site, remove the comma after "from Park Row".
In #Design, remove the comma after "the first story".
Remove the comma after "original building".
Remove the comma after "steam system throughout".
Remove the comma after "19th-century buildings".
Remove the comma after "single connected wall".
"an 180-seat auditorium" → "a 180-seat auditorium"
- Thanks to Chompy Ace for fixing these. Epicgenius (talk) 01:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clarify the "How?" tag in #Legacy.
- Done. I disagree with the addition of the tag in the first place, as the source literally just said the Geiger counter was used to find the cornerstone. But it's minor anyway, so I explained how that worked. Epicgenius (talk) 01:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
- Done. Epicgenius (talk) 01:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikilink Jesse McKinley, John Russell (art critic), Meyer Berger, and maybe Charles G. Bennett.
- Done. Thanks for reviewing the article Some Dude From North Carolina. I see you have started reviews of 30 of my other nominations, so I look forward to your comments. Epicgenius (talk) 01:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try reviewing at least four a day to finish by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.