Talk:New York State Route 308

GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   A few minor prose issues but otherwise good. I'd add the main parameter and the NY 308 abbreviation to the lead.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Imzadi1979 (talk) 16:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I am delisting this article. The lead section is too short, and does not adequately summarize the topic. Most of the sections are too short as well. There are serious issues with the completeness criterion of WP:WIAGA. I am not satisfied that a proper GA review was done in the first place. It looks like a very quick job. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

To be honest, I strongly disagree with your delisting. The lead is fine for the length of the article, and it gives a basic overview of the route. Could you please explain to me what issues there are with the GA criteria and completeness? The sections are as long as they can be. This is a route which is just over 6 miles long, and there just isn't any more information which can b e included into the article. If you still think you can find more, I encourage you to try. Also, it had a fine GA review. What wasn't proper about it? It went through all the steps. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Due to the comments of other reviewers on the GA reassessment, and after re-reviewing the article, I had incorrectly delisted. So I am reinstating the article. I apologize about the confusion. Dr. Cash (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New York State Route 308. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225144705/http://www.nyswaterfronts.com/downloads/pdfs/sig_hab/hudsonriver/Vanderburgh_Cove_Shallows.pdf to http://www.nyswaterfronts.com/downloads/pdfs/sig_hab/hudsonriver/Vanderburgh_Cove_Shallows.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100925145124/http://www.nysba.state.ny.us/bridgepages/KRB/KRBpage/krb_page.htm to http://www.nysba.state.ny.us/bridgepages/KRB/KRBpage/krb_page.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)