Talk:New York Lizards

Lacrosse High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lacrosse, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of lacrosse on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LacrosseWikipedia:WikiProject LacrosseTemplate:WikiProject Lacrosselacrosse articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name Change?[edit]

Anyone know what instigated/why they changed their name? Long Island Lizards sounds so much better as a marketing name to me. Just curious if anyone can contribute more info. 15:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Logo?[edit]

The logo used for the Lizards is not the teams current logo.

2006 East standings for NJ/LI/Roch[edit]

When the seaon ended I sent an email to mll asking about 3-5 in the east I finally got a response today: They (NJ, LI, ROC) would be decided first by overall record but they were all 5-7. Then by head-to-head record among all tied teams, but each team was 1-1 against each other. Then by overall conference record - NJ was 5-5 against the East, and ROC/LI were 4-6, so NJ becomes the "best" of those Teams and the #3 team in the East. The tie-breakers then re-apply to just ROC & LI, so they are both 5-7, both 1-1 against each other, both 4-6 in the east, so the next tiebreaker is total points scored margin in their games against each other. LI won 19-7 and ROC won 15-13, so LI is the "better" of those teams because they were +10 and so LI becomes the #4 team, ROC is #5 and BAL was #6 because they had the worst record in the conf.

So I made a correction on the standings

Smith03 22:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inspiration for team name and logo[edit]

Added a sentence or two about the team's name, which is based on an unusual lizard that has become native to Long Island. Alexandermoir (talk) 02:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New York Lizards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222005259/http://www.lax.com/story.phtml?story=1663 to http://www.lax.com/story.phtml?story=1663
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222005301/http://www.lax.com/stories/MLL-Collegiate-Draft-2008-sid-2113.html to http://www.lax.com/stories/MLL-Collegiate-Draft-2008-sid-2113.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222005409/http://www.lax.com/stories/2009-MLL-College-Draft-sid-2363.html to http://www.lax.com/stories/2009-MLL-College-Draft-sid-2363.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]