Talk:New Rights Party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

This article is essentially a defense of the party's beliefs and activities, not an unbiased account. It ends just after the Rose Revolution of 2003. Waverly57 15:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)waverly57[reply]

This article has probably been written by a campaign manager of the party itself. Totally biased and completely unacceptable for Wikipedia quality standards! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.154.200.108 (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:New Rights logo.JPG[edit]

Image:New Rights logo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Party name[edit]

The correct name of this political party in English is "New Rightists Party" (as opposed to Leftists). An incorrect translation was used in English and spread into other languages, who believed the party's name had something to with rights, as in "human rights". When a mistake has gone uncorrected for too long, nobody dares correct it, and this party name is one example of that.

8h3d0kg (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]