Neopaganism in Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment. I'm not sure that Modern paganism is located at the correct title. Looking at the Google Ngrams it looks like "neopaganism" is much more common of a term. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, due to WP:PRECISION; and as I argue at Talk:Modern paganism#Requested move 24 March 2023, that title also should go back to "neo-paganism": there are "modern pagans" who are NOT "neo-pagans"... but these articles' topics are the latter. Also, concur with Rreagan007. – •Raven.talk 07:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just as I mentioned elsewhere, I think your point here actually is that it should be consistent, just that the main page should change to the name you prefer, which would then be consistent with the name of this page. The other page has just had a discussion to change to "Neopaganism", where I saw you made this point, and the verdict was to remain as it is - as "Modern paganism". I think your point is most relevant to the main page but I don't think it supports using one name here and another one there i.e. for this page to not have a consistent title with the main page as its name currently stands. I think we should use one name across the board for page titles but which name that is should be discussed on the main page, as it was last week. Ingwina (talk) 19:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for consistency and per nom. The RM for Modern paganism was closed; it was not moved to "neo...". — BarrelProof (talk) 05:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.