Talk:Nebka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A nebka is also a type of sandune[edit]

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=nebka
The article Nabkha already exists; I guess adding hatnotes to both articles is the best solution... Edit-pi (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nebka. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khruner (talk · contribs) 20:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


  • I believe that the lead is somewhat not concise enough. Compare it with the brief yet splendidly informative lead of Neferhotep I also written by you.
I have cut down on the lead, let me know if this is still too long.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • ennemies -> enemies.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe this is wrong, but when I wrote my one and only Good article, the reviewer told me that the lead, being a summary of the whole subsequent article, does not require citations which would only be a duplicate of those in the article.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would be nice to standardise the style of dynastic notation, since we have many "Third dynasty" together with "12th Dynasty" etc. Adopting one type over another is a matter of personal taste.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also believe that each "Dynasty" should be capitalised.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think everything looks fine. The sources are undoubtedly reliable and well used, and the article itself seems to be exhaustive, well written, stable and neutral. Khruner (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]