Talk:National parliaments of the European Union

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Judiciary equivalent?[edit]

I propose an analogous article National supreme courts of the European Union. This book, Les Juridictions des États membres de l'Union européenne, is a useful monograph on the topic. – Kaihsu (talk) 11:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EU Senate[edit]

I propose an article about an EU Senat and what constitutes a Senatorial system, and how the current EU system deviates from such system - and in the long run how a senatorial system would embark the Union onto a path of democratic division of powers.

An EU-Senate would be constituted by the equal representations from each national parliament, the role which EU COSAC has today. With an EU Senate, the national parliaments would thus vote (with equal votes due to national equality, that is, due to national soverignty) as a second equal co-legislative chamber and thus replacing the current system with the councils of ministers.

This would introduce Europe to the concept of Division of Powers, as a development of the (in Europe much used) system of parliamentarism. In a system with Division of Powers, government ministers, kings or presidents are not allowed to legislate as this task is solely the domain of parliament. The German system of a Bundesrat, as well as the EU system with a legislative council of governments would in the light of Division of Powers be deemed undemocratic as government ministers in those system are leaving their executive domain and entering the legislative domain of the higher union level. This is considered democratically blasphemic in a system with Division of Powers.

With division of powers, the executive branches (the governments) in the member states as well as the EU commision would constitute a vertical group, the executive branch of government. This branch would lead governmental agencies and bodies on European or national levels. It does not mean that the Commision would be more of a "government" or that the EU more likely would proclaim an independent national state. The changes would of course be on the Union level. Each parliament still legislates on the national level in their own domain. No further power needs to be transferred to the Union level due to the replacement of the Council of Ministers with a Senate.

The second vertical group would, in a system of Division of Powers be the legislative branches: the European parliament, The COSAC/SENATE, and the national parliaments and assemblies would be the only ones with power to legislate.

The third governmental power, the judicial system would be the third vertical governmental branch employed with interpreting the law and issuing judicial descisions, without interference of politicians from governments or legislators.

A system with the division of powers differs from parliamentarism in this: in parliamentarism, the political parties appoints judges and legislators, the latters who then appoints government officials among themselves.

A system with a Senate means that the different populations in the Union are represented through the EU parliament, whilst the soverign states which constitutes the Union are represented through the Senate.

A system with a Senate, with national parliaments taking over the role of the council of ministers, does not mean a further transition of powers from the national levels to the union level and it does not constitute the EU to become a federal superpower. Those are differnt things. A Senate and division of powers only turns the EU more democratic as it involves the national parliaments and excludes the executive branches from doing legislative work.

Recall that the sovereign state of Germany, the Bundesrepublik Deutschland, has a system similar to the current EU system with the Bundesrat acting as the EU council of ministers, which has not stopped the Germans from living in a soverign state. In other words, the Division of Powers is in itself not a way to soverignize and create an EU nation. It merely divides the powers of government into executive, legislative and judicial branches regardless of whether "government" pertains to a country or an organisation such as the EU. 83.177.143.51 (talk) 17:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place for speculation or campaigning I'm afraid, regardless of any of our own opinion son how things ought to be. We simply report the reality.- J.Logan`t: 20:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on National parliaments of the European Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on National parliaments of the European Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]