Talk:Natchez people

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

On the Validity of "Native American flags"[edit]

The current flag for the Natchez listed in the article info is based upon a design created by TME, Inc.,[1] a husband-wife team that designs and produces their own flags based entirely upon what seems to be their own impressions or feelings. This might be a good thing to do and I'm sure it's greatly appreciated by some members of the Native American community, but it would not seem to be validated by the Natchez nation, its elders or its people.[2] This is the 3rd time I have noticed a flag cited as official but with very dubious sources, the first being the flag of Imperial Benin, which has since been taken down as a result of an article rewrite, the 2nd being an purported flag of the Inca, which has also been removed. It would seem that there should be an audit of "indigenous national flags" by experts on this subject. What spurned me to write this in particular was the very modern design of the flag; black, red and white are traditional propagandist colors owing to their affects on human emotion, and as such were employed by socialists, anarchists, communists, nationalists and fascists throughout the 20th century. In something as simple as a flag many statements can be inferred. The people/nations for whom they claim to represent should have a role in determining that message. Unfortunately the effect of this is that we are now seeing made up flags representing former states and current indigenous nations all over the internet, which doesn't seem very fair to the people they claim to represent. ^[1] ^[2] 67.161.102.248 (talk) 23:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.tmealf.com/about/
^ http://www.natcheznation.com/

I understand the sentiment of what you're saying, but in the case of this particular flag, it does appear on the Natchez Nation of Oklahoma website, both on the About Us page and Galleria page. There's nothing unusual about the colors themselves, which are used ideologically the way you mention, but they are also part of many national/subnational flags (Egypt, Yemen, Trinidad and Tobago, Amsterdam, and more). I don't see anything from TME claiming to have designed this particular flag and given that it is used on the nation's website, I think the concern is misplaced at least in this instance. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 00:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History section[edit]

The article doesn't describe any history between the colonial era and modern times. How did the culture survive while living among other tribes?, etc. Rmhermen 14:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The writing style of the history section sounds to me like it was probably written in the colonial era (and cut and pasted wholesale here), which would explain it. I certainly can't imagine any 21st-century Wikipedian writing, "The death of a Chief sometimes resulted in that of an hundred persons, who considered it a great honor to be sacrificed upon his death. Indeed few Natchez of note died without being attended to the other world by some of their relatives, friends or servants. So eager were persons to sacrifice themselves in this way, that sometimes it was ten years before their turn came, and those who obtained the favor, spun the cord with which they were to be strangled." —An gr 07:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article brings up the curious notion of "voluntary suicide". Aren't all suicides voluntary? Perhaps ritual suicide is the better context. ENScroggs 16:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC) Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).[reply]

IPA[edit]

I don't see something to transcribe, so have removed the tag. --Slp1 22:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major overhaul[edit]

I finally got around to overhauling this page. At first I was only trying to organize the text better, find sources for various claims, copyedit, etc. But as I looked for sources I ended up finding a lot of new material to add. I ended up expanding the article quite a bit. If it is too long the history section could be made into its own page, as could the section on "Descent system".

I tried to keep as much of the information that was already here. Hopefully I didn't hack anything up too badly. There are undoubtedly some typos if nothing else. Also, I added a great many footnotes -- probably way more than necessary. But I figured I might as well indicate the sources used for various statements and sections.

In the "Descent system" section I tried to explain Swanton's frequently-cited description as well as various other interpretations. I'm no expert on the Natchez people and am not sure how well I described the "Descent system" -- or how well I understood the stuff I read about it. Also I suspect there are "oral traditions" on the topic. I only used a few sources (they seemed pretty thorough though). I'm not sure how Natchez people today understand the "descent system" (or whether the name "descent system" is appropriate!). Hopefully all this stuff about "researchers" and "theories" are not disparaging to Natchez people today.

On that topic, I read the Natchez Nation webpage as well as the discussion threads on the MSN Natchez group. But I was unable to get a very good sense of the current situation of Natchez people. So again I hope I didn't step on any toes. Wikipedia pages on Indian groups like the Natchez can be tricky to write well, especially when most of the information is historic stuff from long ago. One needs to balance a "past tense" style that suggests a long-vanished people with a sensitivity to people alive today. On one hand it is probably insulting to ignore the continued existence of a people to present times, while on the other hand there can be privacy issues, especially if the present population is small. Anyway, I'm just trying to say that I hope my edits to this page are not disparaging to Natchez people today. Please fix any mistakes I made!

A final comment. In the language section it says that Watt Sam and Nancy Raven were the last fluent speakers. It used to say that they spoke it into the 1950s. But in trying to find sources and confirm some of this, it seemed that both Sam and Raven died in the late 1930s and that there may have been other speakers who lived into the 1950s or so. It was quite difficult to find the answer since a great many websites that mention Sam and Raven are mirrors of wikipedia or have obviously copied the info from wikipedia. If anyone has better information, please add! Also, the page had what I'm guessing are Natchez language names for Sam (watih) and Raven (naNcih). It was unclear what these words were. And why the capital N in naNcih? My web searches turned up nothing but wikipedia mirrors, so I left them out. If anyone can explain what they are, that would be great. A couple other examples: Natchez (našceh) and Sun Woman (Natchez: uwahšiL tama∙L). I left out the first because I don't know what it means. Is it a pronunciation guide? What does the letter š mean? I left out the second, reluctantly, because I was not sure if the Sun Woman was the same as the White Woman. The sources I found used the term White Woman but not Sun Woman. If anyone can clarify, feel free to put the Natchez terms back in. Thanks. Pfly 21:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

I have removed the pronunciation given for "Natchez" and substituted the correct English one, with references to two standard dictionaries. The one I removed may have been the way the Natchez word that is the source of the English ethnonym is pronounced; if so (and if it can be sourced properly), it can be added at a later point in the article as a point of interest, but it is misleading to give it as an English pronunciation. Languagehat (talk) 13:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Were your standard dictionaries referring to the city of Natchez in Mississippi, or the indigenous nation?

The Natchez people themselves pronounce their name "NAH-chee", even when speaking English.

"The Natchez (pronounced Nah’-Chee, Nauche, or W’Nahx’-Chee")(http://www.natcheznation.com/About-Us.html) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Traversetravis (talk • contribs) 18:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Ancient Cahokians Mississippian Period Painting Mural At Cahokia Mounds Historic Site Museum Enhanced Cropped.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:30, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.tmealf.com/about/

[2] ttp://www.natcheznation.com/

[1]

[2]