Talk:Nam tiến

Vietnam Mid‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why no mention of...[edit]

Why no mention of French Indochina, the Japanese takeover of WWII, or the Vietnam War? 68.37.254.48 (talk) 15:15, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could be useful. Please add information if you know something. Nerd271 (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nam tiến. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626122653/http://www.chamtoday.com/index.php/history-l-ch-s/78-the-uprisings-of-katip-sumat-and-ja-thak-wa-1833-1835 to http://www.chamtoday.com/index.php/history-l-ch-s/78-the-uprisings-of-katip-sumat-and-ja-thak-wa-1833-1835

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About "Han" phrase[edit]

I'm Vietnamese I can talk "Han" phrase in this article is wrong. "Han" is not individual phrase about Chinese, more than it's not about Han dynasty. All three, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korea used "Han" phrase with meant cultural, cultural people, civilized or civilized people. That's word opposite meant with barbarians. Vietnamese meant they civilized more than their neighbor: Chams, Laos, Khmer, Thai. The same, Korean call their nation is De Han Min Kuk (대한민국), "Han" not about Chinese anyway, like Vietnamese "Han" phrase just meant civilized. although, all that from an origin word. Đông Minh (talk) 05:31, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Đông Minh: OK. Please provide sources, then. We need reliable verifiable sources, not word of mouth. That's how it works in on Wikipedia. Nerd271 (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]