This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
This is preposterous, defamatory nonsense. Whoever wrote this provided obscure sources that are not representative of the view of the majority of Muslims. Female circumcision is not an Islamic tradition in any sense. It is/was a cultural practice associated with parts of Africa and the Middle East, with no connection to the religion of Islam itself. Muslims from other parts of the world are largely not even aware of the practice because of its irelevance to Islam. Here are legitimate sources, and I request that female circumcision be removed from this list as soon as possible.
http://www.ali-gomaa.com/?page=scholary-output&so_details=22http://www.minaret.org/fgm-pamphlet.htmhttp://www.islamreligion.com/articles/438/— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.29.132 (talk) 00:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
---
cannot be both a literal and not a "literal" translation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.159.16.7 (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]