Talk:Musée de Cluny

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Mid‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France: Paris Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 May 2019 and 30 July 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jps6v.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Museum name[edit]

It seems to me that the title of the page should be the museum's official name, Musée national du Moyen Age, with its old but still popular name of Cluny given as the secondary name. Was there any particular reason why the present set-up was chosen, redirecting from the correct name to the popular one? Awien (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two and a half years with no objections being raised seems like enough. Going ahead and doing it. Awien (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen the name seem to change on their site as well, though now it appears the "older" way, as "Musée de Cluny -- Musée national du Moyen Âge" http://www.musee-moyenage.fr/. Perhaps we should tweak the title again so it reads Musée de Cluny -- Musée national du Moyen Âge FULBERT (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Si vous êtes Français, Fulbert, joyeuse fête nationale. And as for going back to Musée de Cluny, I have no objection. That's what it'll always be in my mind anyway. Awien (talk) 18:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I am American and just visited the museum again (for the 5th time) while on holiday. That is when I noticed the discrepancy with our naming here. Made the name change, and will likely need to tweak the page itself to make it consistent. Thanks for keeping on top of this!! FULBERT (talk) 13:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe my favourite museum in the world! And thank you too. Awien (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

I am not sure I understand what was moved by @Brookie: in the page move; I could not see any change or understand what happened. Anybody? FULBERT (talk) 16:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was a double hyphen in the page name - I simply removed one of them as it wasn't necessary.

Brookie :) { - like the mist - there one moment and then gone!} (Whisper...)

15:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Brookie! FULBERT (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Musée de Cluny - Musée national du Moyen Âge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060115132045/http://www.musee-moyenage.fr/ang/index.html to http://www.musee-moyenage.fr/ang/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 April 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 08:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Musée de Cluny – Musée national du Moyen Âge → Musée de Cluny – Restore original, shorter title. Article was moved here due to a good-faith but misguided appeal to this being the "official name", but there's no need for the subtitle; there's only one Musée de Cluny, and the museum is unsurprisingly referred to as just this routinely (English language reliable source examples that omit the subtitle entirely: [1], [2], [3]). The French Wikipedia article is just at fr:Musée de Cluny as well. SnowFire (talk) 08:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and common name. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear common and less verbose name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support still most common, at least in English. Johnbod (talk) 18:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The present version is the most appropriate form in combining the "popular" name - among those in the know - with the decreed official name, the one that appears on the signboard outside the building and in the museum's addresses. Awien (talk) 13:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.