Talk:Murder of Stephanie Crowe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shouldn't redirect from Michael Crowe[edit]

searches for Michael Crowe should redirect to the false accusations page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.153.192 (talk) 21:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:43, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Richard TuiteMurder of Stephanie Crowe – Naming the article after the crime rather than the perpetrator appears to be more in line with Wikipedia practice and with WP:CRIME. The Stephanie Crowe case was not just about Richard Tuite; it also included a highly notorious incident of false confession, described at False confession#Michael Crowe. The crime is far more notable than he is, based for example on Google hits (30,200 for "Stephanie Crowe" vs. 8,200 for "Richard Tuite"). Furthermore, since Tuite's conviction was overturned and he is currently being retried, it may violate BLP to have the article about this crime be under his name. MelanieN (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support as proposer. If the article is moved, I will undertake to rewrite/refocus it to be about the crime rather than about Tuite. --MelanieN (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Clearly the "accused" is just one element of the case. Green Giant (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom and normal practice. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. let us not diminish the true import of the facts here. Torquemama007 (talk) 13:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A second missing knife?[edit]

An IP has twice added to the article a claim that both Aaron Houser and his brother had knife collections; that both of them had an identical knife missing from their collection; and that the second missing knife has never been found. I have reverted this claim both times, because (a) no evidence or citation is provided, and (b) in a search of both Google and Google News I could find no such claim, or anything close. On the contrary, the reliable reporting is that Aaron Houser's mother became concerned about her son Aaron's knife collection, had him check it, found a knife missing, and reported it to police.[1] If the brother also had a knife collection, why didn't she check it too, and report that one of the brother's knives was also missing? I seriously doubt whether this story has any basis in fact. I have asked the IP where they are getting the information, so that we can evaluate whether it is a Reliable Source. Until such a source is found, I believe this claim should not be in the article. --MelanieN (talk) 04:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After discussion: the IP user claims personal knowledge of the case. That would be WP:OR. We can't include this material until it is on the public record. --MelanieN (talk) 15:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The "second" knife was brought up at Tuite's preliminary hearing according to this article: [2] I'm unaware of the issue being part of either of Tuite's trials. It's not mentioned in the CA court of appeal's summary of the first trial. There wasn't a lot of media coverage of the second trial so it's possible it was mentioned but went unreported. Harper41 (talk) 21:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Murder of Stephanie Crowe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Murder of Stephanie Crowe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]