Talk:Mr. Virgin

A fact from Mr. Virgin appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2018 Nepali comedy-drama Mr. Virgin was criticised for its title?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mr. Virgin.

Wikipedia

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that 2018 Nepali comedy-drama Mr. Virgin was criticised for its title? Source: Mr Virgin bringing a ‘sex comedy’ to the mainstream "Criticism of Mr Virgin’s title follows an incident earlier this year where the movie Ganja Baja"

Reviewed: Mahapurushartha yagam

Created by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 11:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

New enough, long enough, neutrally written, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref verified and cited inline. Image is fair use. QPQ done. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 16:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]