Talk:Mount Victoria (Auckland)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 11 October 2014[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure)innotata 23:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Mount Victoria, AucklandTakarunga / Mount Victoria – New name for cone.[1][2] Haminoon (talk) 05:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Oppose MOS:SLASH we should avoid slashes whenever possible. WP:SUBPAGE this makes the appearance of a subpage, and messes up the associated talk pages, which will assume it is a subpage. Further, per internet wide usage, this is assumed to be a subpage in URL formulations. We can replace it with a DASH, like how other jurisdictions use an mdash. WP:OFFICIALNAMES we don't just use official names because they are official -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 11:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Takarunga is a redlink, so it is available for use. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 11:24, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment A slash is allowed "where a slash occurs in a phrase widely used outside Wikipedia, and a different construction would be inaccurate, unfamiliar, or ambiguous"; and we have a precedence with Aoraki / Mount Cook. Usually in NZ the general usage rapidly follows the official name (as we saw with Aoraki / Mount Cook). Haminoon (talk) 21:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The Board on Geographic Names is still using "Mount Victoria" (-36.826389, 174.798889). Let's see how others deal the issue. There is no prize for being the first to change the name. Claimsworth (talk) 06:28, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Why would an American military website be more relevant than Land Information New Zealand? see:[1] Please note that Takarunga has been in use for much longer than Mt Victoria and there are no prizes for Wikipedia being slower than a colonial state to recognise it. Haminoon (talk) 07:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • Uh, because BGN is recommended in our guidelines. It's the main primary source that other geographic references are based on. This problem has come up before with India. Various name changes get gazetted, but they don't all catch on. Claimsworth (talk) 07:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

References

  1. ^ "Ngā Mana Whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau Collective Redress Act 2014". Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  2. ^ "Volcanic cones regain Maori names". Retrieved 11 October 2014.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Victoria (Auckland). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]