Talk:Mount Blum

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Stub‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Geology[edit]

The rock is granite and it's only 15,000 years old? That seems implausible to me, though I'm not a geologist. I don't see how granite (a plutonic rock, formed deep underground) would be brought to the surface, exposed, and formed into a mountain that quickly. I'd love to see a citation. 206.208.105.129 (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mount Blum/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The elevation, latitude and longitude do not match the values from reference 2. In particular, the longitude should be W (as in North America) instead of E (as in China).

Ref 2 gives 7638/2328 484514N 1212853W, instead of 7680ft/2340m 47°29′26″N 121°18′04″E.

Better now? Astronaut (talk) 20:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)