Talk:Mosler MT900

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sports Car Racing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports Car Racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sports Car Racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sports Car RacingWikipedia:WikiProject Sports Car RacingTemplate:WikiProject Sports Car RacingSports Car Racing articles

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

"Three MT900s were entered at the May, 2005 RAC Tourist Trophy race at Silverstone, England, finishing second, fifth, and twelfth. The car also took a class win at the FIA GT race in Imola, Italy."

Not exactly true. The three MT900s entered at Silverstone would have finished 2nd, 5th and 12th if they were running in the GT2 class, which they're not. They will be next year, if the car is homologated, pending confirmation of the existence of 25 road-going cars. As for the class win in Italy, the Moslers are eligible for the G2 class, for national championship cars that are not allowed to score points in GT1 or GT2. Actually, the car has taken a class win in two of the four races (three if you count Monza, where the car finished below the minimum distance limit), but it's usually the only one in it. All performance comparisons are made with the two works-prepared 996 GT3s, which run in GT2. --Pc13 11:03, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)

Should I state that the car has a 62.3/37.7% front/rear weight distribution or a 37.7/62.3?[edit]

I think that Car and Driver made a typo (a.k.a. a mistake) in its PDF showing an embarrassing, front-heavy weight distribution of 62.3/37.7%. 76.254.19.111 (talk) 04:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mosler MT900. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060417123653/http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtests/10768/road-test-review-2006-mosler-mt900s-page2.html to http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtests/10768/road-test-review-2006-mosler-mt900s-page2.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090917013551/http://www.australiangt.com.au/car_specs_mosler_mt900_gt3.php to http://www.australiangt.com.au/car_specs_mosler_mt900_gt3.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]