Talk:Mongol conquest of the Jin dynasty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Genghis Khan statue UB MGL.JPG Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Genghis Khan statue UB MGL.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Genghis Khan statue UB MGL.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Sino-Xiongnu War - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 22:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arrow in the knee[edit]

I removed this sentence and citation as the citation didn't support the claim at all. I'm not sure when it was entered as it seems to have been there for a long time. The citation is freely available on archive.org here[1] for those who wish to read the cited text. To be thorough, when I noticed the claim went back past 2010 when this book was published, I did some more digging and found another edition of the book published in 2004 (and titled slightly differently). This version[2] of the book does mention him being wounded by an arrow, but makes absolutely no mention of it hitting his knee at all. Just simply that he was wounded. I'm not quite sure how to treat that. If a later edition of a book removes something an earlier edition mentioned, there could be a reason for it, like it was found to not be verifiable.--222.109.91.138 (talk) 02:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]