Talk:Monarchomachs

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

European history

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Defining the Monarchomachs[edit]

Hello. I am having trouble identifying the monarchomachs for this page. JWAllen (1928) lists Languet, Mornay, Buchanan and Boucher as the 'chiefs of the monarchomachi' (p331) so I was wondering on what grounds the others are included on this page. I don't think that William Barclay's original work is translated out of Latin so I can't go to that source to confirm things. Any thoughts?

Ccorton 13:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are several sources included in the article, for example here by Gallica and here. Authors such as François Hotman are widely recognized as famous Monarchomachs. Is there any of them which you suspect of not being a Monarchomach? Tazmaniacs 16:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I do not know Allen's work, but bear in mind that it is from 1928, not 2007. Tazmaniacs 16:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"collective corpse"?[edit]

Does this make any sense at all?

They considered that the people was a collective corpse, doted of a specific wisdom, which allowed him better than the king to understand the common good, discrete from the interest of each of its parties.

-- Calion | Talk 00:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"collective body" might be better, no? Two main ideas: the people form a collective body which has more wisdom, collectively, than the king ; the common good is not equivalent to the simple sum of particular interests. Tazmaniacs 12:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monarchomachs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070507125351/http://www.memo.fr/dossier.asp?ID=1011 to http://www.memo.fr/dossier.asp?ID=1011

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]