Talk:Mohie El Din El Ghareeb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NOPV[edit]

Extremely NOPV, ass-kissing all the way through!--Shanel 02:50, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

This is a hagiography, not a biography. Tweeq 03:53, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an Egyptian, Mohie EL Din El Ghareeb maybe a good economist, but I never heared that he was called a Ceasar or a Traveller or whatever... I thought he wrote this himself, if so then he's very self-centered... Meedo29 12:11, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an encylopedia article? highly POV. Since all the above comments are similar, I'll tag it.--Wedian 04:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is ridiculous! Can someone provide any sources or references? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.84.16.190 (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag[edit]

I've re-added the neutrality dispute tag again. User:Inter Dir (contrib) and User:82.201.169.26 (contrib) have added biased content without any citations including allegations that Atef Ebeid's government has resigned after the exoneration of Dr. El-Ghareeb in what is publicly thought to be the bill paid by the former government! .The fact that El-Ghareeb was imprisoned was also removed and replaced by a section stating these were just disputes. [1]. Also, i previously added fact tags to the statements claiming that El-Ghareeb is currently the second in command of the National Democratic Party of Egypt,that he worked as the International Monetary Fund director and that he is ranked among the 100 best Politicians of the whole world. These tags were also removed by User:82.201.169.26 without adding any evidence or citations. [2]. I previously explained to User:Inter Dir that expressions like "HE Prof. Dr. Mohie El Din El Ghareeb" don't belong to wikipedia [3] but he keeps adding them anyway.--Wedian 12:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:F2266.jpg[edit]

Image:F2266.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV template without ongoing discussion per Template:POV instructions[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mohie El Din El Ghareeb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]