Talk:Modern history of Ukraine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possible spam?[edit]

When young, Yanukovych was sentenced to 3 years because of theft, looting and vandalism and later had his sentenced doubled.

This is under the Modern history of Ukraine#Yanukovych rule section. It does not seem relevant to the discussion and seems entirely out of place.--Teoh Han Hui (talk) 04:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

terrorist-like ?[edit]

Any sources proving not terrorist but terrorist-like? Xx236 (talk) 06:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists assasinated 36 Ukrainians (among them one communist), 25 Poles, 1 Russian and 1 Jew.Xx236 (talk) 06:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC) https://www.academia.edu/454566/Terrorists_or_National_Heroes_Politics_of_the_OUN_and_the_UPA_In_Ukraine - terrorist organisation.Xx236 (talk) 06:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

eastern Galicia and Volhynia were annexed by the Soviet Union.[edit]

The annexation wasn't legal.Xx236 (talk) 06:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Ukrainian Insurgent Army that fought both Soviet and Nazi forces and cleansed Western Ukraine of ethnic minorities.Xx236 (talk) 11:11, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Modern history of Ukraine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Invasion of Ukraine[edit]

As the section for the Russian Invasion of Ukraine had only a link to the main page, I think a short description of it would be helpful. I have added a small paragraph myself, though I feel someone could definitely make it better. Also, the page does say this is outdated. Bashstash01 (talk) 23:30, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some concerns about WP:UNSOURCED and WP:NPOV[edit]

This article is generally well-written whenever statements are supported by sources. But I'm worried about unsourced statements, especially because they appear to voice certain opinions. One such example is the following sentence:

[Poroshenko's] procrastination with the sale of its own confectionery factory in the Lipetsk oblast of Russia, the scandal with the use of offshore to minimize taxes paid (Panamagate) also did not contribute to the high rating of the president. Even the historic acquisition of autocephaly from Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I (tomos) and the creation of an independent Orthodox Church of Ukraine did not help restore the wasted trust in the Ukrainians. It was one of the most effective five years of Ukrainian state-building, but also one of the most controversial, when the president had to overcome the urgent challenges of the present, unable to break with the past. This is something a journalist or scholar might write, and it may even be somewhat valid as a criticism of Poroshenko's presidency, or perhaps the ecclesiastical policy of the Patriarch of Constantinople. But it is WP:UNSOURCED, WP:POV, and in this case also probably WP:UNDUE. The reader is supposed to believe that, because Poroshenko took a long time to sell his factory and other stuff, Ukraine wasted five years doing nothing (except state-building) and being stuck in the past. Either this is written by someone who really dislikes Poroshenko, or someone who thinks that there is something wrong with the independence of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, or Ukraine in general. I don't think it is particularly difficult to reason why this might just be a bit of an NPOV issue... Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 20:46, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Modern_history_of_Ukraine&oldid=1209118198"