Talk:Mixed-use development

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2021 and 24 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katya Olsen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 15 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ogunjimb. Peer reviewers: JasonHunt1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restructuring and editing this article[edit]

I am taking a stab at restructuring and rewriting this article. Several major issues that are apparent include:

  • No references for the vast majority of content here
  • No distinction or explanation of the difference between "mixed use development" in the generic sense of zoning (or lack thereof), versus "a development" that is, a project or (the UK term) "scheme" which is planned as mixed-use
  • Grouping of the material into sections.

Some of the changes I have made:

  • Added explanation of the difference between "mixed-use development" in the generic sense of zoning (or lack thereof), versus "a development" that is, a project or scheme which is planned as mixed-use
  • Moved the section about Asia into the list of mixed-use development projects
  • Split the list of examples of mixed-use development into those that are purely zoning versus those that are projects/schemes

- Keizers (talk) 16:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great steps taken there! Thanks (even though belated). -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 10:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just to echo user:Horst-schlaemma, I wish there were more editors here with an interest in the topic. Ottawahitech (talk) 08:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion: at the end of the end of the Social benefits paragraph, a sentence states "Safety of neighborhoods is in turn increased as people stay out on the streets for longer hours." Either this claim needs a citation or a qualification.Somebody1226 (talk) 03:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for massive deletion[edit]

... but this is how wikipedia creates vicious cycles of information sourcing, by keeping unreferenced original essays for years and infesting the internets with them. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

inappropriate[edit]

what does a pointless single-use tourist attraction have to do with mixed-use?! reference to the vessel should be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.154.17.134 (talk) 16:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]