Talk:Mickle Fell

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British and Irish hills

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles

Yorkshire Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Mickle Fell is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

?[edit]

Could someone explain the term modern yorkshire?, as yorkshire is not (as a whole) used in any form of regional or local government I think the term is unclear and weasely. Mickle fell should always be Yorkshire's highest peak, Whernside might be the highest peak in North Yorkshire or the highest peak in the Yorkshire and Humber region but I disagree with it being referred to as Yorkshire's highest peak.

I sentence about whernside in brackets should be removed.--Marshman21 (talk) 13:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think this has been fixed - now mentions "historic yorkshire".

I agree with the above that the definition of a "modern Yorkshire" seems inappropriate. I have revised to clear things up using more correct terminology and also tried to retain the valid point of interest for peak baggers re: Whernside. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.222.49 (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

High cup[edit]

As far as I can see High cup is nearer to murton and dufton fells and not on mickle fell. I think this section should be moved, but am not an expert on this subject, so may have misunderstood. Can someone check please.Sf5xeplus (talk)

Recent change[edit]

The recent change in the details of the counties that this is in is wrong as the place cannot be in 2 ceremonial counties at the same time. The text plus the note gives it in County Durham and North Yorkshire so something is wrong and clarification is needed. The change did not make it clearer but worse. Keith D (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

currently it says this It is the highest point of both the ceremonial county of County Durham and the historic county of Yorkshire, lying in the former Teesdale district which was transferred under the Local Government Act 1972 - ?? makes sense to me.Sf5xeplus (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry me mis-reading it. Probably needs some clarification to stop others mis-reading it as well. What does the transferred bit relate to and why mention Teesdale at all? Keith D (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure (tried to clarify - Teesdale is the bit it is in that was transferred under the boundary changes) - I agree it is still confusing - I've changed it a bit maybe for the worse. If you can make it clearer we'll all be grateful. Sf5xeplus (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]