Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Jeanne

Meteorological history of Hurricane Jeanne is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 15, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
August 16, 2008	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Jeanne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Excellently written article. Passing. Gary King (talk) 01:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:URFA/2020[edit]

Duplicate links
Needs alt text
There is quite a bit of meteorological scholarly literature that isn't discussed here.
Reference formatting is inconsistent. Some have the last name only and others have a full name. Many of these first and last names are available through the NHC.

I'm going to go ahead and list this at WP:FARGIVEN to see if anyone else would like to take a crack at fixing this up. Noah^Talk 14:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WPTC CCI check NOT DONE. Noah^Talk 14:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricane Noah: There doesn't seem to be that many edits to this article since you posted this. Do you still have concerns that this article might not meet the FA criteria anymore, especially because of the scholarly literature that you found that isn't sourced here? If so, would you or any editor be interested in fixing this up or posting this to WP:FAR? Z1720 (talk) 19:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]