This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Definitely notable, the News Ghits gives good hits. The context tag can be removed since the recent edits clearly establish the context. GameKeeper (talk) 22:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable. It's not up for deletion and shouldn't be, either. This is the kind of initative which will have a number of good sources, for example, local newspaper reports, even government policy documents. Keep improving the article, perhaps some photos of places to be included in the forest, a map. Itsmejudith (talk) 12:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is no reason why this should be considered for deletion. DDStretch (talk) 12:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
T.Wang_ex_Cheng.JPG){kind=small}