Talk:Menen Hotel

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect.

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Nauru.

Architecture

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles

Notability/Tourism[edit]

This seems to be only touristic information and as such should be moved to WikiTravel as per WP:AFDP. Pascal.Tesson 23:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really tourist information, because Nauru is only a tourist destination for the terminally curious. 194.97.161.50 07:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Value of Menen Hotel section[edit]

I am not an expert on WP rules, but if the question is does this article contain some encyclopedic value rather than travel value, then I would be inclined to say yes. I was using WP to look at the history of the Island of Nauru and the present day economy, including tourism, and the article certainly helped me in that respect, as it is the islands only hotel. So if you removed it then I would have learnt less on the Nauru economy. Of course, maybe it should be in the Nauru section. Is it poorly writen and a bit of an advertisement, yes, but it still imparts usful information. Anyway, thats my two bobs worth. JL

I agree, if you look at the actual Nauru article, this is the only tourist hotel (other than a hostel) on the island nation --which is notbale because the island-country is economically desparate. When you hear a South Pacific Island is in financial straits you think about tourism --yet due to the ecological damage and lack of infrastructure this island apparently only supports one hotel, this one. There's a reason this country was fascinating enough to get people turn it into a featuer article, and this is one aspect of it. --Bobak 19:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Count me in as in agreement also. This is the only hotel in an entire country! As a reference work Wikipedia should include this article.

I also came in through the Nauru article which is fascinating and think that there should be an entry here - especially given the fact the hotel seems to have no site of it's own. But certain information seems too impermanent and not particularly encyclopedic i.e. "The hotel package includes a colourful sketch map of Nauru."--Artificialard 18:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems an accurate enough description; some day perhaps we'll have an article on local maps, like those from hotels and chambers of commerce. Given how brief the article is, I think any detail which helps to convey what this place is like is useful, as long as it's accurate and meets NPOV and OR guidelines. Perhaps "colourful" is an opinion, but I'm not going to bother changing it to "color". I am going to remove the tag, though, since we seem to have consensed that having the article in wikipedia is reasonable. Akb4 14:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Menen Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070830112941/http://www.nelsonarchitects.com.au/menenhotel.htm to http://www.nelsonarchitects.com.au/menenhotel.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]