Talk:Membrane paradigm

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Keeping it real[edit]

The entire "what is reality" section seems like speculation, and doesn't belong here. Ken Arromdee 07:50, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So I've deleted it. At least until someone can come up with a source which says "The use of this argument to support general relativity is problematic.". Ken Arromdee 19:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong article[edit]

This article is not about membrane paradigm, but about holographic principle (a completely different thing).--213.141.159.52 07:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was suprised to see them linked together. --Michael C. Price ^talk 13:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless anyone objects I shall delete the holographic principle related stuff here. --Michael C. Price ^talk 09:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetic field lines[edit]

Be nice to see a mention of the above as well. Are they locked onto the membrane, for example. And what relevance has this for quasars? --Michael C. Price ^talk 13:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Different Credit?[edit]

Kip Thorne himself credits Hanni and Ruffini for the membrane paradigm. Why the disagreement? Jlodman (talk) 02:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]