Talk:Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

multi speed europe[edit]

See Talk:Opt-outs_in_the_European_Union#multi-speed_europe. Alinor (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a footnote about latest dates of " temporary transitional periods after accession of new states " in the CVM article, but this is not the best place - the supposed central "intra-EU-differences" article would be more appropriate for such minor notes. Alinor (talk) 18:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CVM table[edit]

Why was the old table, which included suspensions for CVM, Schengen, and ERM, suddenly changed after 13 years just because Romania and Bulgaria left CVM? Aren't the CVM reports supposed to help the EU know if a country's judicial system is strong enough for the country to be able to join both ERM and Schengen? Why is it omitted from the new table? Schengen and ERM are related to CVM and should be in an article like this. It won't make the article off topic, because CVM is related with Schengen and ERM! Keep the old table, it has served the article just fine for 13 years so why is it suddenly being changed now that CVM doesn't apply to Bulgaria and Romania anymore? Thememeryt (talk) 18:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, CVM has no formal connection whatsoever to Schengen or ERM. Reference: [1] (″The Commission has never made a link between Schengen accession and the CVM, as these are separate strands of work, each with its own requirements.″). --Nablicus (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay, but why is the table only being changed now after 13 years??? Thememeryt (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, let's try and reach a consensus: How about we just remove the table altogether? As of 15 September, nobody is suspended from CVM or the market, so I think there is no need for a table if nobody is suspended Thememeryt (talk) 21:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a WP:NOTFINISHED, so there is always room to improve it. Including the unrelated policy derogations in the table just confuses the subject, and is better dealt with on other articles, such as Multi-speed Europe.

I think keeping the table to show the policy areas formerlly subject to the CVM is still useful to illustrate the subject. TDL (talk) 23:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay, that sounds good Thememeryt (talk) 00:41, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]