Talk:McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleMcDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 2, 2019.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 24, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 17, 2012WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
August 12, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 28, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Royal Australian Air Force's F/A-18 Hornet fighters (pictured) have been deployed as far afield as Qatar and Alaska?
Current status: Featured article

GAN review[edit]

I have opened a GAN review at Talk:McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service/GA1 but the template doesn't seem to work correctly . or is it something i have done?Petebutt (talk) 21:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I'm not sure what's gone wrong with the template. Nick-D (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Petebutt (talk · contribs) 21:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Well-written

(a) the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Pass
Factually accurate and verifiable

(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and (c) it contains no original research.

Pass
Broad in its coverage

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Pass
Neutral
it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
Pass
Stable
it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.[5]
Pass ish (not been in main-space long enough to tell, but it seems likely that it will pass. I suggest re-assess this criteria in one month.)
Illustrated, if possible, by images

(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Pass

Petebutt (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Does this article cover Australia's use of the Super Hornet or not? If not, this should be made clear,, while if it is within the scope, then more detail should be added.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, the Super Hornets are quite different aircraft (with a distinctively different name). That's noted in the last paragraph of the 'production' section. Nick-D (talk) 23:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet in Australian service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another fine one from Nick-D; could you add some dates/context/"as of"/past tense/whatever on items like this throughout and check for MOS:CURRENT?

  • Since 1999, the RAAF has put its Hornets through a series of upgrades to improve their effectiveness. However, the aircraft are becoming increasingly difficult to operate and are at risk of being outclassed by the fighters and air-defence systems operated by other countries. As a result, the RAAF is currently retiring its F/A-18s, and the last aircraft is scheduled to leave service in the early 2020s.

No need to get back to me, marking satisfactory, unwatch, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:24, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sandy, I've just updated the article. Nick-D (talk) 00:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A few more[edit]

  • "The next loss occurred on 2 August 1990 when two No. 75 Squadron Hornets (A21-29 and A21-42) collided. A21-42 crashed, killing the unit's commanding officer; the other aircraft was damaged but managed to return to base. On 5 June 1990 A21-41 crashed 100 kilometres (62 mi) north-east of Weipa, Queensland, killing its pilot." - Something seems off here - shouldn't the June 1990 have been the next loss, not August 1990?
  • "As of September 2017, all of the remaining 71 F/A-18s were still in service" - any update needed for this?

Looks good, marking satisfactory. Hog Farm Talk 17:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]