Talk:Mazari (tribe)

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Balochistan, Pakistan, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Let us upgrade[edit]

For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 03:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lepel Griffin[edit]

A lengthy quote by Lepel Griffin is repeatedly reinstated to this article. The quote is ridiculously long and Griffin is not a reliable source per consensus of the Wikipedia community. We don't use Raj era sources like this. - Sitush (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions[edit]

This sort of contribution is useless. Wikipedia requires that information is verifiable and that almost always means we need to provide reliable sources to support our statements. You can't just add stuff that you know. I am reverting it. Again. - Sitush (talk) 20:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I have just reverted to a "last best version" yet again. Please note the information at WP:V and that British Raj sources, such as Lepel Griffin, are not considered to be reliable on the English-language Wikipedia. - Sitush (talk) 23:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]