Talk:Mayor of Split

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mayor of Split article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yugoslavia Mid‑importance

	Mayor of Split is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Who was (not) a mayor?[edit]

According to this text, Alberti, Ivulić and Sarti - numbered here as mayors #2, #3 and #4 respectively - were acting mayors. Acting officials are usually not treated as actual office holders: for example, the second President of Croatia is Stjepan Mesić, not Vlatko Pavletić. Consequently, it is quite likely that at least one of the above mentioned three does not meet WP:GNG (if that's all they did). GregorB (talk) 20:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I wrote all the lists... :P Didn't know those three guys were acting, good catch there. -- Director (talk) 03:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Numbering[edit]

The numbering is hopelessly muddled, and unlike Popes, not useful for distinguishing names. Can we remove it? --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's because people keep muddling it... Fixed it now. -- Director (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great, but the linked articles may also need their infoboxes corrected. --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones? -- Director (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]