Talk:Maurice Mounsdon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Maurice Mounsdon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Maurice Mounsdon was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 12 December 2019.

Wikipedia

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Military history: Aviation / Biography / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Lead image[edit]

How soon after a death may a non-free image be used? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use is applicable at any time. On Wikipedia, we allow this when the person is dead. The subject here is dead and so fair use is allowed, especially as the image in question is quite historical in nature. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So Stephen, your rationale for removal was "too soon after death for a non-free image" the first time and "not fair use" the second time. Is this still supported by written policy? Or how soon is "too soon", exactly? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus is to wait 6 months, and use a non-free image after attempts have been made from family, agencies and other sources to source or release a free image. Step hen 00:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, the main way I obtain free images is to take photographs myself but this is no longer possible once the subject is dead. The other option is to search archives for images which out of copyright or CC. I have conducted such searches in this case, didn't find any, and this is adequate. Trying to contact members of a dead person's family would be offensive harassment contrary to WP:HNE. I have had a recent death in the family myself and would consider it quite suspicious if some unofficial stranger were to approach me out of the blue and try to persuade me to sign a legal agreement. A period of six months for such harassing activity would be quite arbitrary and is not based on any policy or legal requirement. There is no consensus that such behaviour is proper or required and I would expect explicit legal indemnity before doing so. If others want to do this at their own risk, that is up to them. Per WP:CHOICE, demands cannot be made that we engage in such risky, uncertain and laborious initiatives. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is this consensus of "6 months" written down somewhere? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The policy for using non-free content suggests that pictures of deceased persons can be used, in articles about that person, “provided that ever obtaining a free close substitute is not reasonably likely”. Uploading an image on their death does not meet this condition, and six months has developed over multiple such discussions as a reasonable discovery period after the subject’s death. I’ll link the most recent when I’m off mobile. Step hen 07:41, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The time of death is the reasonable cutoff for this. That's because the possibility of "taking a new free picture as a replacement" is no longer there. A six month extension is arbitrary and illogical and does not appear in the WP:NFC guideline. As the guideline supports use of an NF image in this case and the topic is in the news now, we should use the historical image which best represents the subject's notability. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I do not believe there is any guide or policy related to a (6 month wait after death) to use a non-free image - if there is an RFC or some other policy I am not aware. Additionally this is a historic photograph with no commercial value attached. The creator nor anyone else is harmed by the use of the photo. Lightburst (talk) 14:23, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]