Talk:Mark Lawson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Please note that Mark Lawson mentions Wikipedia in his recent article, refering specifically to this recent anon edit. This may warrant further attention. As anon edit did not provide any sources, and Lawson refers to his edit as a mistake, I am reverting him.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside.... I too saw that article ML wrote mentioning his Wikipedia entry, and it's for that very reason that I went in and put the reference to the Viz cartoon, 'The Artful Podger', just so that he would read it!!!! Celebrities shouldn't let on that they read their Wikipedia articles.... Milvinder 20:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The anonymous editor 66.228.120.35 seems to have spent the first week in March adding statements about Jewish origin to dozens of Wiki biograohies. In many cases, these are spurious, and s/he has never added any comment about why this is worthy of comment in any case. I don't know whether the editor is an anti-Jewish racist trying to prove that Jews control the media, finance and politics, or a Jewish chauvinist trying to prove the same thing; but in either case this seems like an abuse of Wikipedia by an unidentified troll. RolandR 21:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. 66.228.120.35 (talk · contribs) is a troll, no doubt about it. Revert on sight.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't ML write for the Catholic Herald or some such paper? Someone should fill the article out with that and his drooling love of all things American. Pliny 00:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plastic Turkey[edit]

In Dec 2003, Lawson wrote a column based on the claim that the turkey President Bush held up in front of photographers during his Thanksgiving 2003 trip to Baghdad was a plastic fake. He was wrong: that was a real turkey.[1] This plastic-turkey meme, and Lawson's key role in spreading it, are notorious in some parts of the blogosphere; should we say something about it in the article? (Has Lawson or The Guardian ever issued a retraction?) Cheers, CWC(talk) 04:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Tim Blair has written a column in The Daily Telegraph (Australia) about this. CWC(talk) 18:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving[edit]

Apparently Lawson is leaving Front Row because there have been accusations of bullying. What is being claimed here, that Lawson has been bullied or that he is a bully? 86.166.161.236 (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not mentioned in the WP article. Anna (talk) 18:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bullying is a problem in the BBC Radio Arts Unit as a whole; the unit produces a number of programmes for Radio 3 and 4. Articles on such developments as Lawson leaving Front Row usually provide context and it is unclear if Lawson is involved in the bullying in any way. Remembering Liz MacKean and her untransmitted report on Savile for Newsnight, it can be the innocent and vindicated who have to leave their posts. Like most, I only have the reports of the last few hours to sift for information. Philip Cross (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
RE WP:BLP you'd want hard sources before adding anything on this, either here or the article. Neither are the place for rumours or gossip. Anna (talk) 20:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I take back what I say above about Mark Lawson. The Telegraph article I have just cited in the article is clearly a reliable source. Whether Lawson has a defence for the claims which have clearly been made against him remains to be seen. Philip Cross (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mark Lawson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Lawson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]