This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
If somebody understand french, he'll find a complete article of Mark Curtis in the french wikipedia: Mark Curtis... Ajor 19:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm giving your translation request a shot--let me know how it looks to you if you want because I'm not overly familiar with Mr. Curtis. ThanksLazulilasher (talk) 23:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I translated the French page to this one, pretty much directly. Please let me know if anyone thinks it's not sufficient and I'll take another look. Considering that I'm not familiar with Mr. Curtis' work, I was wondering if anyone knew of some criticisms this gentleman has recieved? Most of this article seems to be an overly glowing review of him. Thanks! Lazulilasher (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
