Talk:Lynn Chadwick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Lynn Russell Chadwick (artist) be merged into Lynn Chadwick. They are clearly about the same topic but Lynn Chadwick pre-dates the new article by 6 years. While it is questionable whether Lynn Russell Chadwick (artist) should have been created (from an Articles for Creation draft) in the first place, the new article is generally good and identifies a number of authoritative sources on Chadwick. We wouldn't want to 'throw the baby out with the bathwater', would we?! Sionk (talk) 21:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very happy for the articles to be merged, with some reservations about reference link spamming and the use of copyrighted photograph. Theroadislong (talk) 07:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is an excellent idea, how do we got about doing this? And once again, sorry for not observing the correct protocols. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.145.130.18 (talk) 08:15, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I didn't realise there were responses here. I removed the merger discussion template from this article because ‎Bgwhite has over-ridden me and redirected Lynn Russell Chadwick (artist). I don't think the idea of expanding the article is contentious anyway. I'd just suggest someone expands the old article, using some of the new info from the new draft (it will still be available in the edit history). Sionk (talk) 22:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]