Talk:Ludwig Sütterlin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutral Point of View Discussion[edit]

Can you help me make the article more neutral?

SvenHolz (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be a big problem within the article. I would also like to see some more resources and perhaps why he is notable. I made some small changes in the first few paragraphs (not the last) to make it more neutral, but I would like some more help from others who know about Mr. Sütterlin. Pleasure to help Babylonian Armor (talk) 03:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's truly an honor to see he has a page, and I'm grateful for your assistance, Babylonian Armor. This is my first article so please bare with my mistakes and errors. On the topic of resources, I'll have to begin more in depth research, which hasn't been difficult so far. Cheers! SvenHolz (talk) 03:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remember to cite your resources by using references. Also, try to find some external links about Mr. Sütterlin, it helps with the overall quality and information in the article. Babylonian Armor (talk) 03:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Naturally! Could you help me add an image? I tried, but failed. SvenHolz (talk) 03:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am not particularly the best with images, but I can give you some advice: Create an infobox for Mr. Sütterlin, and, try to find an image on Wikimedia commons. If not, attempt to contact the owner of the copyright of one of his images from elsewhere, and inquire whether you are able to use that picture on Wikipedia. If you can, upload that picture to the commons, and then, post the file link to the infobox. Babylonian Armor (talk) 03:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again! I was successful in adding the image, and all I have to do is finish formatting it! SvenHolz (talk) 04:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I added the infobox into the article, to improve the format, in turn improving it's quality. Babylonian Armor (talk) 04:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Amazing. It's good to know that it finally does justice to Mr. Sütterlin's prestige. SvenHolz (talk) 04:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Tags[edit]

I think both tags on the article should be removed on the grounds that references have been added, and neutrality - erased. However, I would not argue if someone said this article was still a tad prejudice, but at this point, I think it complies with our NPOV standards, and is certainly referenced. I am content for waiting for Wikipedians of a higher authority to come about, but I would like this to be resolved quickly. Thankyou, Babylonian Armor (talk) 04:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All thanks to Babylonian Armor! SvenHolz (talk) 04:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ludwig Sütterlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]