Talk:Locating engine

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

redirect to Real-time locating system, 24 April 2016, see discussion.
keep, 26 March 2008, see discussion.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

References[edit]

There are no references. Internal inks to other articles by the same author are not references. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Niemeyerstein, happy to see your work. This article may get deleted if you're not careful. It's a good idea to spend more time looking for sources than writing, sources that can back up every sentence in the article. This article is more mathematical than your other articles, and you're in luck ... WP:WPM has many members and they're very active, I'll go post on their talk page to see if they can help you. Wikilinks are never references, so I will move those links to a See also section. - Dan Dank55 (talk) 03:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh how I love these encyclopedic police people. Yes, in the first approach there were no references. Fine that you also recognized that, I would not have remembered, if not, thank you. Feel invited to contribute, mathematics is no private property, you know. Niemeyerstein_en talk 17:35 2008-03-31 —Preceding comment was added at 15:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide references in the body of the text. My understanding of the deletion discussion [[1]] is that the current weaknesses need addressing. I tagged the article with what I consider as these directions for improving the article. Widefox (talk) 09:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please contribute or feel free to delete the text. There is no need for policy policemen. Thank you. --91.65.62.242 (talk) 07:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modeling[edit]

If there is someone competent to wortk on the modeling aspect and with access to additional literature in English, please contribute. The current output appears somewhat stronger in German.Wireless friend (talk) 14:29, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

The desire for cleanup from Nov 2008 has not led to any improvement. Hence it is understood that the major problem is the complex mathematics in the basement of the lemma. The editor took the freedom to acknowledge this assessment and turned the comment to "technical".Wireless friend (talk) 07:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]