Talk:Livvy Dunne

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Gymnastics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gymnastics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gymnastics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GymnasticsWikipedia:WikiProject GymnasticsTemplate:WikiProject GymnasticsGymnastics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Gymnastics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's gymnastics task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

edit
history
watch
purge

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Olivia Dunne.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

– Brianjd (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

‘Childhood home’ image[edit]

This article contains the image File:House in Hillsdale, New Jersey in 2022.jpg, currently captioned as: The childhood home where Dunne was raised in Hillsdale, New Jersey. This image was previously called File:Olivia Dunne.jpg; it was nominated for deletion, as noted above.

This information lacks a source (despite my request for a source at the file’s deletion request); I cannot find this information elsewhere on the web. The file was nominated for deletion on the basis that it was ‘obvious doxxing’. This raises WP:BLP and WP:DOX concerns.

This information was added by the same user who uploaded the file: Paulthelawyer. As I wrote this, I discovered that this edit had actually been reverted already by Hipal, then repeated by Paulthelawyer.

Pinging @KENGRIFFEY24FAN, Kai Burghardt, Infrogmation as other involved users. Brianjd (talk) 08:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added in Special:Diff/1121130002. Reverted in Special:Diff/1124813592. Added again in Special:Diff/1125077426.

@Hipal: Why do you say that there is a COI here? Brianjd (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have actually never seen a source for an image: [[Image:Foo|thumb|caption]]<ref>Source</ref> If there was some text: OPD has lived at address XYZ you could reasonably demand and theoretically produce a written source corroborating name + address XYZ (but we would remove such information for privacy concerns). I think by “COI” Hipal meant “don’t use self-published sources” in biographies on living people, from which images are exempt, though.

I cannot share any harassment concerns. Reportedly this is her childhood home. We have reason to believe that as an adult Baton Rouge resident she does not frequent this place anymore, hence probability of harassment is marginal. Certainly, to some extent privacy does also encompass next of kin (presumably her parents/former guardians live there), but then the intensity of privacy invasion must be even stronger.

As it stands, I would only remove this image as an editorial choice. The encyclopedic value it adds is negligible. You could, for instance, deduce “Her parents/legal guardians weren’t filthy rich, but also not dirt-poor.” yet for accessibility such information is better provided in text. ‑‑ K (🗪 | ✍) 18:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, Paulthelawyer is promoting their own work across multiple BLPs, of which this is just one. --Hipal (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it again. Sanctions apply. If someone wants to make a strong case for it's inclusion, please properly verify the information and demonstrate it is of encyclopedic value for inclusion in this article. --Hipal (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image involves a picture of a house visible from a public road, and no one entered on to anyone else's private property to take the picture. Anyone can walk or drive past this residence and take a picture with their personal phone or camera. The address information is readily verifiable through official government data sources, including documents from the Bergen County Clerk's website, to verify that Olivia Dunne's parents are indeed the owners of this property. So any decision pertaining to this picture would purely be an editorial choice, not a matter of "doxxing" or disclosure of personal information. Nothing would prevent other people from driving past this residence and taking their own pictures to post on Wikipedia. The current/former personal residences of many famous people are already on Wikipedia. Paulthelawyer (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote, "Sanctions apply". Please drop it. --Hipal (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal The image is back up, so perhaps it’s time to enact those sanctions. Brianjd (talk) 12:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the picture. If it goes back up, perhaps someone should bring this issue to ANI. Michael60634 (talk) 20:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal and Michael60634: The ever-efficient Paulthelawyer has put it back up, as their third reversion in 28 hours. Brianjd (talk) 02:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianjd I've reverted it and left a notification on their talk page. Michael60634 (talk) 02:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And the edit warring continues. Looks like we are going to ANI with this.... Michael60634 (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User indefinitely blocked: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1118#Paulthelawyer adding personal info and edit warring. Brianjd (talk) 05:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

– Brianjd (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rizzed up Baby Gronk[edit]

Olivia has been popular the past week for being involved in a viral clip with a little league football player. Or something like that, I don't really know. Anyway, there's an article from a reliable source about it, but the whole thing is pretty clearly a joke and doesn't belong in the article. But since it is RS, I'm posting here to try and establish consensus that it shouldn't be added to the article because I guess technically an argument could be made to add it. WPscatter ^t/_c 23:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a significant part of her internet fame and should be added. 2601:244:4000:DC10:9B4:BB77:8EFF:24E6 (talk) 03:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's too early to say whether this is a significant part of her internet fame. Things like this come and go unbelievably quickly. If it does stick, then I'm not opposed to a paragraph about it written in an encyclopedic tone. But we shouldn't just state that she "rizzed up Baby Gronk" in the article since that's nonsense. WPscatter ^t/_c 03:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But she did rizz up baby gronk. 2.30.72.138 (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, I know you're (at least half-) joking, but just because it happened doesn't mean it belongs on Wikipedia. WPscatter ^t/_c 19:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wpscatter, well I've now made an article on Baby Gronk, soo... - Knightoftheswords (Talk · Contribs) 23:33, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New picture needed[edit]

An updated picture of Livvy is sorely needed. Bdavid1111 (talk) 03:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it’s really creepy to have a picture so old when there are so many more current ones 2600:1003:A010:BE39:3D61:5AC1:C750:F4AE (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It might even be fair to use a fair use argument to use a copyrighted portrait for the infobox if there aren't any recent free use portraits available simply because of how downright wrong it seems to use a picture of Livvy as a minor when she has since become a sex symbol of sorts. RyanAl6 (talk) 22:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]