Talk:List of tallest buildings and structures in Leeds

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal List of tallest buildings and structures in Leeds is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Criterionplace1.jpg[edit]

Image:Criterionplace1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Criterionplace1.jpg[edit]

Image:Criterionplace1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 14:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion Place[edit]

Shouldn't this be moved into top ten proposed developments as opposed to top ten future developments considering it has yet to pass planning permission? --Wrh1973 (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LaLumiereTower1.jpg[edit]

The image Image:LaLumiereTower1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tallest buildings table[edit]

This is broken, but I can't work out how to fix it. SOmeone with greater knowledge of where the data should be please fix this.

Joel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.196.193 (talk) 11:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New tallest building in Leeds/North East.[edit]

The Sky Plaza by Unite is slightly taller than Bridgewater place. I would update but do not know how. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.23.54.139 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got any reference for that? Keith D (talk) 22:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plaza II[edit]

This is now completed and needs adding to the list.

Old Norwich Union building height[edit]

Does anyone know what was the height for the former Norwich Union building in City Square was until it was demolished for 1 City Square in the 1990s (and if it is tall enough to be added to the demolished buildings list)? http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3599/3483988522_4e28a49d9f_o.jpg Wrh1973 (talk) 19:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cottingley Heights & towers[edit]

Could someone look again at the two entries at 9=. They seem to me to be the two towers of Cottingley Towers. If so, why the two rows, why the "Cottingley Heights" which in any event redirects to Cottingley, Leeds? Why not just have one row with 9= and a comment that there are two identical towers? --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Needs updating[edit]

1st reference is a dead link. Regardless, Leeds cannot be the fastest growing UK city in 2012 from a 2006 research paper.
Lumiere has been cancelled - yet it is still listed as a 'future development'.
Not sure about 'increasingly prominent skyline'. Apart from the Bridgewater Place there are few meaningful tall buildings which have been constructed in recent years. Stevo1000 (talk) 04:53, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of tallest bridges in the world which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Pointscrossx.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]