Talk:List of knights grand cross of the Royal Victorian Order appointed by Victoria

List of knights grand cross of the Royal Victorian Order appointed by Victoria is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on November 6, 2017.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 15, 2014	Featured list candidate	Promoted

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Orders, decorations, and medals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Numismatics High‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 22 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from List of Knights Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order appointed by Victoria to List of knights grand cross of the Royal Victorian Order appointed by Victoria. The result of the discussion was moved.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Knights Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order appointed by Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090719073143/http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Honours/RoyalVictorianOrder.aspx to http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Honours/RoyalVictorianOrder.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111231155538/http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Honours/Knighthoods.aspx to http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Honours/Knighthoods.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 September 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved - other contributors to the discussion have suggested Queen Victoria may be an exception, if they want to make a separate RM there, that's fine. DrStrauss talk 14:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– No reason why the title of King or Queen cannot or should not be included. --Nevé –selbert 00:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose all but possibly Victoria. No reason to include King or Queen, and yes there is a reason not to, see wp:concise. Possibly Victoria should stay as is too for consistency, I can argue that one both ways. It's borderline whether the word Queen adds anything there, IMO. Andrewa (talk) 05:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Andrewa. I don't see much value in the moves. Victoria is the only one that would make sense if you were going to move any, as the argicle itself is at Queen Victoria. — Amakuru (talk) 10:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Knights Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order appointed by Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150316003931/http://www.debretts.com/forms-address/titles/knight/honorary-knighthood to http://www.debretts.com/forms-address/titles/knight/honorary-knighthood

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 December 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 09:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– Making "knights" and "dames" lowercase seems like a fairly obvious move per MOS:JOBTITLES, but "Grand Cross" is tricky. Per my proposal, I have no problem rendering it lowercase as well. However, I can also understand the case for List of knights Grand Cross of the... and List of knights and dames Grand Cross of the..

Open to either change per the community consensus. Woko Sapien (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Routine application of lowercase for plurals of titles per MOS:JOBTITLES. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Routine application of lowercase for plurals of titles per MOS:JOBTITLES. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I meant to include List of Dames Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire in this proposal too. Since there seems to be a burgeoning consensus here, I decided to move it to List of dames grand cross of the Order of the British Empire ahead of time. I can revert that if this request is somehow denied. --Woko Sapien (talk) 22:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.