Talk:List of equipment of the Pakistan Army

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.army-technology.com/projects/wz-551-type-9092-wheeled-armoured-personnel-carriers/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 22:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Equipment of the Pakistan Army. Jenks24 (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Modern equipment and uniform of the Pakistan Army → Equipment of Pakistan Army – the article includes equipments currently used by pakistan army. But not all of them were modern. The uniforms of pakistan army is not mentioned in the article. Rameshnta909 (talk) 15:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Necrothesp Agree with you. - Rameshnta909 (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

There are 250 al fahad ifv in service with pakistan army. Humayun1997 (talk) 13:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Equipment of the Pakistan Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Makarow-pistol[edit]

Wasn't the Makarow-pistol never in use in Pakistan? --Exodianecross (talk) 01:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Equipment of the Pakistan Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2017[edit]

Please remove the PRC flag next to the Al-Khalid and Al-Zarrar tanks. The Pakistani flag is the only one that should be there as it is the only country that produces these specific standards of the tank, other countries have helped in some aspects however the tanks are of indigenous Pakistani manufacture and origin. 85.154.166.84 (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. This has been discussed before. Those tanks are jointly produced by both China and Pakistan. Please provide reliable references that state that the tank is sourced and built without any Chinese components. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:26, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Marking as answered. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 08:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2017[edit]

Follow on request for removal of Chinese flag next to the Al-Khalid and Al-Zarrar tank - This a Pakistani built tank, all of it except its engine is made in Pakistan. SOURCE - http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/pakistan/mbt-2000.htm 85.154.166.84 (talk) 18:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are more sources that state it is a joint development project. ([1], [2], [3]). Adamgerber80 (talk) 20:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Per the sources show above by Adamgerber80. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Equipment of the Pakistan Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Khalid Tank[edit]

While it has been established there has been cooperation between China and Pakistan in the development of tanks its mostly at the unofficial level, and probably limited to the development of subsystems not tanks as a whole. The Al-khalid tanks in service with Pakistan are very different than the MBT-2000's in service with Morocco. While Joint-ventures like the JF-17 have both countries scoring an export order together, its not the same thing here. The Al-Khalid and MBT-2000 tanks are not inter-operable, they are fundamentally different tanks. A tank built by China does not have a joint work-share agreement with Pakistan, and vice versa. The Al-Khalid tanks are not listed under the manufacturer's website under the Joint-Venture product list. http://www.hit.gov.pk/product.html While it is also important to note that HIT is developing upgraded variants of the Tank like Al-khalid 1 and 2 independently without the apparent joint development deal with Norinco. An example of a jointly developed tank would be this, which the Al-Khalid and MBT-2000 are not. https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/2017/05/12/Jointly-developed-Indonesian-Turkish-tank-makes-debut/8881494581101/ While it is understandable why some media has listed the tanks as the same, it is best we go by the manufacturer's categorization which has it listed as a independently developed product. China does not manufacture nor was involved in the development of the Al-Zarrar and Al-Khalid tanks DIRECTLY.

There is a discussion which is going on Talk:Al-Khalid_tank#Un-merge_Al-Khalid_and_MBT-2000.3F. Please reply there. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the section 'Utility & Support Vehicles'[edit]

Hi guys.. the 'Utility & Support Vehicles' section on this article needs expansion and the current entries are mostly outdated. Expansion of this section requires 'reliable sources' which are too few in number. Given the vast inventory of these vehicles armies have in general, and their classification as not weapons, I propose the removal of this section from the article. It, however, depends on consensus. --Maxx786 (talk) 15:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maxx786 I agree with this. In the absence of reliable sourced this section can be removed. Adamgerber80 (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for updates[edit]

This article should be updated with latest equipments as shown in the official Pakistan Army military parade 23-March-2018 (Pak Resolution Day). Source: https://www.dawn.com/news/1397042/nation-celebrates-pakistan-day-2018-with-military-parade-gun-salutes & https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/pakistan/army-equipment.htm Mtkhan1989 (talk) 05:35, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be very specific with your requests. Also, global security is not really a reliable source for this page. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Utility & Transport Vehicles[edit]

One of the biggest army without having "Utility & Transport Vehicles"? This section should also add in this page with upgraded equipment. Mtkhan1989 (talk) 08:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Small arms section has many unsourced firearms like scar, AK 103 and hk416[edit]

you should add citation or delete it Manashvi Upadhyay (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

@$tar Anonymous: can you explaint this edit? Did you read the source? I looked at the source and found the number to be 200 there, not 2,000.VR talk 22:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2023[edit]

Yahyakhan2 (talk) 21:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Yahyakhan2 (talk) 21:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please 🙏 Yahyakhan2 (talk) 21:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Yahyakhan2 (talk) 21:58, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. aboideautalk to me! 22:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2023 (2)[edit]

Yahyakhan2 (talk) 22:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

X Yahyakhan2 (talk) 22:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

X to Y Yahyakhan2 (talk) 22:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Note that edit requests don't give permission for you to edit the article directly, you would have to post your changes here first so we can add it to the article itself. 💜  melecie  talk - 22:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2023[edit]

Mai sirf mai (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to do some edits Mai sirf mai (talk) 19:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2023[edit]

Murtasim khan (talk) 14:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong quantity of equipment

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Princess Persnickety (talk) 16:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Credibility of given Numbers of weapons.[edit]

on this page most of the numbers/data of weapons are uncite,even many cited numbers are randomly put by editors, there are no relations between citation and the number of weapons in many weapons.Also many of the uncited numbers are just Randomly given by editors. Dl ff (talk) 12:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1000 al-fahd apcs[edit]

the source is inaccessible and every language wikipedia has a different number of vehicles -Persian page says that Pakistan has 250 apcs -Arabic Wikipedia says that Pakistan has 140 apcs -Russian Wikipedia says that Pakistan has none but has a photo of the Egyptian al-Fahd vehicle which is not the same model and has nothing to do with the al fahd that Saudi Arabia produced there are no photos of al fahd in pakistani service from what i can see Kwangila (talk) 13:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2024[edit]

Emanuwal macron pasha (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 22:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 April 2024[edit]

Suii Guy (talk) 09:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Empty. Toadette (Let's talk together!) 09:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024[edit]

Not all mentioned numbers of arrillery systems are verified.....some are non operational used for cannibalising parts 2409:40E0:103E:7F67:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 16:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Liu1126 (talk) 18:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_equipment_of_the_Pakistan_Army&oldid=1220753893"